Arizona Real Estate News Access
All the real estate and mortgage news you need to know in Arizona
Categories:

Archives:
Meta:
April 2024
S M T W T F S
« Oct    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
07/19/09
FDIC will start suing bank executives, local experts say
Filed under: General, Business
Posted by: Lillian Wong @ 8:49 pm

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. is expected to start taking civil and criminal legal actions against bank directors and other business executives involved in the real estate meltdown and soured deals that have dragged down the financial sector.

Legal and financial experts expect the FDIC to initiate civil lawsuits seeking financial damages from bank directors and other individuals deemed responsible for bank failures. The suits would seek civil damages for lost funds, but also could evolve into criminal prosecutions. Those actions would mirror lawsuits filed by the FDIC and other federal entities in the late 1980s and early 1990s against savings and loan executives Charles Keating and Neil Bush.

Michael Manning, managing partner of the Phoenix law office of Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP, prosecuted Lincoln Savings & Loan cases involving Keating. He expects the FDIC to file civil suits against bank directors, developers, commercial brokers and attorneys in the wake of more foreclosures and failures in the commercial real estate market.

“That will start the more serious inquiries by the FDIC,” he said.

Manning said the FDIC will have more ammunition to sue bank directors and others involved in commercial deals, because those deals are larger than residential mortgages, and any negligence or fraud will be magnified. While bank executives are the most likely targets, Manning said prosecutors could go after real estate developers, brokers, appraisers and accountants, as well as their corporate attorneys, if they intentionally misled or misrepresented projects to lenders.

“Typically, the insider can’t do this alone,” Manning said.

Seventy-nine banks have failed since the beginning of 2008, including First National Bank of Arizona, Washington Mutual and Silver State Bank, all which operated in Valley.

Jack Hebert, a < ?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = “urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags” />Phoenix attorney with Polsinelli Shughart PC, represented Keating in American Continental Corp.’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy case in 1989. He said the federal government could use some of the legal powers gained in the S&L aftermath to go after banks now.

“All of their superpowers are still in existence,” he said.

Hebert said the FDIC could sue bank directors for significant damages for negligence and defaulting on their fiduciary duties. He said more extreme cases could prompt civil and criminal fraud charges. He predicts most of the civil cases will be settled out of court.

FDIC spokesman David Barr said the federal banking regulatory agency has not filed any director suits and does not comment on future actions.

Suits likely will be filed, said Dale Walters, CEO of Keats Connelly & Associates LLC, a Phoenix-based investment firm.

“I expect (the FDIC) to make a statement,” he said. “The government wants to show the public they mean business, and that what they are doing to fix the banks is working.”

The faltering commercial real estate market is prompting foreclosures as well as scuttled commercial and mixed-use projects. A tanked real estate market in Phoenix and other large U.S. cities could exact a higher toll on the banks that financed those projects, prompting more failures and lawsuits.

“The FDIC generally engages in a broad-based investigation any time there is a failure of a financial institution,” said Allen Kimbrough, executive director of the Maricopa County Bar Association. “Of particular interest or concern to the FDIC are issues such as self-dealing or breaches of fiduciary duty by directors or management, or even attorneys, which may result in civil litigation. On occasion, the matters are so egregious that criminal prosecution is warranted and pursued.”

Kimbrough did legal work for the FDIC and for some defendants in Texas during the S&L crisis in the late 1980s.

Several banking officials in the Phoenix market contacted for this story did not respond to requests for comment.

It is likely the FDIC and other prosecutors will go after failed banks, in part because regulators can access all of a bank’s records after it falls into receivership. But legal experts said there also could be civil or criminal actions against executives, directors and other deal makers at banks that are still operating if they made deals negligently or fraudulently.

Milton Schroeder, a law professor and banking law expert at Arizona State University, said the FDIC has a broad range of regulatory and legal powers at its disposal, and it could look at possible misuse of funds, reckless negligence, fraudulent appraisals and financial mis­management.

Get Connected

Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP: www.stinson.com

Keats Connelly & Associates LLC: www.keatsconnelly.com

Polsinelli Shughart PC: www.polsinelli.com

Maricopa County Bar Association: www.maricopabar.org

Fast Facts

Notable U.S. bank failures since January 2008:

First National Bank of Arizona
Washington Mutual
Silver State Bank
First Bank of Beverly Hills
IndyMac Bank
Bank of Wyoming
Colorado National Bank

Source: Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

Phoenix Business Journal - by Mike Sunnucks Friday, July 17, 2009



Bookmark and Share
Subscribe

share

Leave a Reply